|
Introduction
Between August 1997 and December
1998, the Program issued forty-four AAASHRAN alerts concerning the cases
of sixty scientists representing twenty scientific disciplines whose
human rights have been violated, and eight issues at the intersection
of science and human rights. Of the twenty-eight cases listed, ten concern
scientists who were released from prison, some after many years of imprisonment.
Many of the alerts issued in the time period covered by this Directory
provide updates on cases that were the subject of previously issued
alerts. Therefore, an individual case may be the subject of various
alerts. The type of alert, be it new or updated, is indicated in each
alert and in the AAASHRAN archive, where all current and past alerts
may be accessed.
This Directory is not meant
to be exhaustive. The Program gives special attention to cases of particular
urgency, such as those involving such major human rights violations
as extrajudicial execution, disappearance, torture, or imprisonment.
It also addresses significant violations of professional rights, or
scientific and academic freedoms, such as loss of employment, revocation
of academic degrees and responsibilities, and restrictions on international
travel, contacts with foreign scientists, and the free exchange of ideas.
The Program adopts individual
cases on the basis of corroborated and well-documented information provided
by authoritative international human rights and scientific organizations,
and checked and verified by AAAS. This year we have made a concerted
effort to address cases brought to our attention either by individual
scientists, scientific organizations, or grass roots NGOs. We also have
concentrated on cases that fall outside of the mandate of traditional
human rights groups, such as Amnesty International, and which may thereby
not receive the attention that cases addressed by such groups receive.
Our purpose in publishing this
Directory is twofold. First, it is intended to facilitate the exchange
of information among human rights groups, scientific societies, and
individual scientists. We hope that readers who have additional information
about the cases listed, or who know of cases falling within our mandate,
will pass this information on to us. Second, and most important, the
publication of this information in a systematic form, along with the
AAASHRAN archive, is intended to assist the scientific community to
take action on behalf of persecuted colleagues. It is our hope that
this publication will encourage other scientists around the world to
inform their colleagues about violations that they have experienced
or witnessed.
The violations appearing in
this year’s Directory took place in twenty countries. The country with
the largest number of cases listed in this Directory is Libya, where
more than thirty scientists were among scores arrested. Six cases were
reported in Cuba, followed by China and Turkey with four cases each.
Engineers comprise the largest number of the cases in this Directory,
accounting for twenty-five cases, followed by twelve cases of medical
professionals, four cases of physicists, and three cases of mathematicians.
This year’s Directory also contains
information about the international treaty obligations violated by each
country. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights enumerates international
standards that were accepted by the United Nations General Assembly,
without opposition, by all member states. Many of the rights enumerated
in the Universal Declaration have become part of international customary
law and should therefore be respected by all countries.
In addition to the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, each country is held accountable to the
standards that it has recognized through ratification of international
treaties. Among the cases listed in this Directory are violations of
rights and freedoms recognized in the following treaties:
African Charter
American Convention on Human
Rights
Convention Against Torture
and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment
Convention on the Elimination
of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women
Convention on the Rights
of the Child
European Convention for
Human Rights
International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights
International Covenant on
Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights
Medical Codes and
Declarations
Declaration of Tokyo (DT)
World Medical Association's
1948 Geneva Declaration (WMAGD)
World Medical Association's
International Code of Medical Ethics (WMAIC)
United Nations Principles
of Medical Ethics Relevant to the Role of Health Personnel, Particularly
Physicians, in the Protection of Prisoners and Detainees Against
Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment (UNPME)
Among the rights and freedoms
denied the scientists listed in this Directory are:
- right to life, liberty and security
of person
- freedom from arbitrary arrest, detention
or exile
- freedom of expression
- freedom of peaceful assembly and association
- no one shall be subjected to torture
or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
- right to a fair and public hearing by
an independent and impartial tribunal
- right to the enjoyment of all economic,
social, and cultural rights
- respect for medical ethical standards
- right to conditions which assure to
all medical attention and service in the event of sickness
- right to liberty of movement and freedom
to choose residence
- rights of the child
- freedom from discrimination against
women
- freedom from arbitrary or unlawful interference
with privacy, family, home or correspondence
- right to enjoy the benefits of scientific
progress and its applications
- right of a victim of an act of torture
to obtain redress and adequate compensation, including the means
for as full rehabilitation as possible
- freedom from interference with scientific
freedom
- right to conduct professional activities
without interference
- right to leave any country, including
one's own, and to return to one's country
A listing by key word of the
violations that are referred to in this Directory and their corresponding
international treaty articles can be found in the "Violations by Key
Word" index.
Sources
of Information
This report is based on information
received from many human rights organizations from around the world,
including:
American Anthropological
Association, Committee on Human Rights
American Mathematical Society,
Committee on Human Rights of Mathematicians
Amnesty International
Association of European
Universities
Belgrade Center for Human
Rights
Belgrade Circle
Bellona Foundation
Burma Information Group
Centro de Investigaciones
y Estudios Superiores en Antropologia Social del Sureste
Committee of Concerned Scientists
Chinese VIP Reference
Digital Freedom Network
El Nadim Center for the
Management and Rehabilitation of Victims of Violence
Equality Now
Human Rights in China
Human Rights Foundation
of Turkey
Human Rights Watch
Human Rights Watch, Committee
on Academic Freedom
Interparliamentary Human
Rights Foundation
Israeli Information Center
for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories (B'TSELEM)
Lawton Foundation for Human
Rights
Lawyers Committee for Human
Rights
Libyan Islamic Group
Mental Disability Rights
International
Middle East Studies Association
of North America
MINKAHYUP Human Rights Group
in Seoul
Moscow Human Rights Research
Center
National Spiritual Assembly
of the Baha'is of the United States
New York Academy of Sciences,
Human Rights Committee
Palestinian Independent
Commission for Citizen's Rights
Physicians for Human Rights
Sisterhood is Global Institute
(SIGI)
Washington Kurdish Institute
Supporting information came
from news and articles published in major US newspapers and journals,
information supplied by individual scientists, family members and friends
of scientists, and scientific societies, US embassies and the US Department
of State.
Guidelines
for Adoption of Cases of Concern
The Science and Human Rights
Program of the AAAS focuses its case action activities on three main
areas: 1) violations of scientific freedom and the professional rights
of scientists, engineers, health professionals, students in any of these
fields, scientific organizations, and professional groups representing
their interests; 2) violations of the human rights of scientists not
directly related to the conduct of science; and 3) participation by
scientists in practices which infringe on the human rights of others.
Cases may relate to government
policies and practices that violate the professional and human rights
of scientists in general, or to repressive actions taken against or
by individual scientists.
In addition, cases may relate
to governmental policies and practices that restrict the ability of
scientists to perform their work, misuse science to carry out human
rights violations, contravene internationally-recognized professional
codes of ethics, or target specific groups of scientists or scientific
organizations for repression. Cases may involve, but are not limited
to, issues of academic freedom, restrictions on the right to travel,
and infringements on medical neutrality or other violations of principles
of professional ethics.
For the purposes of deciding
whether action by the AAAS is appropriate, scientists are defined as
those who are members of any of the disciplines meeting the criteria
for affiliation with AAAS. This includes those assisting in scientific
initiatives and health care workers.
The Program's human rights activity
is based on the following principles:
- Science is a worldwide enterprise that
requires freedom of thought, communication, and travel, and the
freedom to pursue professional activities without interference.
- Scientific societies should encourage
international respect for the human rights standards embodied in
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international
treaties, as a matter of scientific freedom and responsibility.
- Respect for human rights is an end in
itself and not a means to other desirable ends (such as scientific
progress), although it may serve to promote such ends.
- Scientific groups should not seek any
special rights for scientists outside of those general rights embodied
in international law.
- Scientific groups have a special interest
in responding to violations involving individual scientists, groups
of scientists, or scientific organizations or institutions because
we have a special collegial identity with scientists, not because
scientists are more deserving than any other group of individuals
whose rights might be violated.
- The role of scientists in society is
a priority of AAAS. Scientific groups have a responsibility to speak
out against government policies that require scientists to participate
in the execution of policies that result in human rights violations
or that use science to carry out human rights violations.
- Groups should support their international
counterparts who are vulnerable to governmental restrictions and
abuses because they engage in research that may be perceived as
having negative political implications.
- Scientific societies should support
individual scientists, groups of scientists, or scientific organizations
or institutions in countries where governmental policies may conflict
with established professional ethics.
- Cases of human rights violations frequently
occur in conditions of widespread political repression, the elimination
of which is likely to be a long-term process. Nevertheless, pressure
from public bodies outside the country concerned can be effective
in these cases (for example, in securing the release of a political
prisoner, helping to protect the safety of someone whose life has
been threatened, or ensuring respect for scientific freedom and
responsibility).
The Program communicates its
concern about the violation of scientists' professional and human rights
to the appropriate government officials of the country involved and
to US government officials. The Program also provides AAAS member associations
and other non-governmental organizations with information about specific
cases and encourages them to express their concern.
The Program adopts individual
cases on the basis of information provided by authoritative international
human rights organizations and, where suitably documented, by human
rights groups or scientific associations in the country concerned. The
goal is to deal with all cases meeting AAAS criteria as soon as possible
after the particular violation has occurred. The Program also attempts
to keep old cases under review, and to periodically renew complaints
or inquiries until a satisfactory resolution is achieved.
Issues
Addressed by AAASHRAN
-
The dismissal of more
than twenty professors and researchers in Cuba because of their
support of a declaration urging greater academic freedom and compliance
with human rights standards.
-
The dismissal of a number
of professors and researchers in Mexico who were engaged in environmental
monitoring projects.
-
Forty-two professors dismissed
from Addis Ababa University. The basis for the dismissals was the
professors' joint letter of protest of the government's violent
reaction towards demonstrating students.
-
A major case involving
academic freedom regarding the arrest and discharge of a number
of professors and researchers in Uzbekistan for their political
views, affiliations, and activities.
-
The arrest of doctors
in Peru for the alleged treatment of subversives. Despite protections
under several international agreements, including the Code of Ethics
of the College of Physicians of Peru, several doctors were held
for long periods based solely on the accusations made by repentant
subversives.
-
The use of psychiatric
hospitals and treatment for detaining political prisoners. Three
men were reportedly being detained in psychiatric hospitals in Beijing
and Shanghai for political rather than medical purposes.
-
Denial of travel visas
for Dr. Mirzayanov to attend two scientific meetings in Germany
by the Russian Office of Visas and Registrations in the Ministry
of the Interior.
-
The suspected use of chemical
agents and other agents of mass destruction against the civilian
Kurdish population and villages in Iraq.
-
Mexican officials' refusal
to permit independent international forensic experts to observe
autopsies of persons killed during the Chiapas uprising. The refusal
made it more difficult to investigate and document allegations of
numerous violations of international human rights that were reported
in the area, including a report that San Carlos Hospital of Altamirano
in the Chiapas region had been under armed siege from local townspeople
who had criticized the facility and its staff for providing medical
assistance to wounded Zapatistas.
-
Discriminatory eugenics
laws passed in China. The Standing Committee of the Chinese People's
Congress adopted a law designed to limit "inferior births." Where
this law has already been instituted, doctors have routinely been
coerced into performing abortions, sterilizations, and infanticide
in compliance with this and other population control laws.
-
The nonconcensual removal
of organs for transplantation from executed prisoners in China.
-
The harassment by Chinese
officials of forty-five prominent scientists and intellectuals who
petitioned the Chinese government for the release of political prisoners
in a joint letter.
-
The continued detention
of over 100 health professionals imprisoned in Syria since 1980.
Doctors, surgeons, general practitioners, ophthalmologists, pharmacists,
gynecologists, medical students, veterinary surgeons, and dentists
were among those arrested. They were arrested and imprisoned without
charge or trial following a one-day strike held in March 1980.
-
The use and sale of antipersonnel
land mines.
-
The denial of United States
entry visas to Cuban scientists seeking to enter the United States
to attend an international scientific meeting.
-
The adoption of governmental
policies to censor opponents of female genital mutilation in the
Gambia and the subsequent reversal of the policy (this case is addressed
in detail in the "Issue" section of this Directory).
-
Coercion and detention
of health professionals in Iraq to carry out decrees in violation
of internationally recognized medical ethics.
-
Governmental interference
with the work of centers for the treatment of torture survivors
in Turkey, including infringements on physician-patient confidentiality
(this case is addressed in detail in the "Issue" section of this
Directory).
-
The introduction of legislation
in Iran that may seriously jeopardize women's health. The law requires
full segregation of health services provided in hospitals based
on gender (this case is addressed in detail in the "Issue" section
of this Directory).
-
Progress in the elimination
of female genital mutilation (FGM) in Egypt, the Gambia, and Kenya
(this case is addressed in detail in the "Issue" section of this
Directory).
-
The sale of organs in
the United States from executed Chinese prisoners (this case is
addressed in detail in the "Issue" section of this Directory).
-
Attacks on education for
Baha'is in Iran, where authorities arrested at least 36 faculty
members of the Baha'i Institute of Higher Education (this case is
addressed in detail in the "Issue" section of this Directory).
-
The harassment of researchers
and teachers in the state of Chiapas, Mexico (this case is addressed
in detail in the "Issue" section of this Directory).
-
The passage of a new law
by the Serbian Parliament that seriously undermines academic freedom
and the autonomy of Serbian universities (this case is addressed
in detail in the "Issue" section of this Directory).
|