Programs: Science and Policy
http://shr.aaas.org//emerging_issues/healthprofessionalsandtorture.htm
AAAS Scientific Responsibility, Human Rights and Law Program
Health Professionals and Torture
Resources & Background Reports
"No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment."
--Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
The Issue At a Glance
The revelations of prisoner abuse in U.S. operated detention centers in Iraq and Guantanamo Bay, Cuba have put the spotlight back on the issue of torture. Despite formal treaties and human rights declarations, torture occurs around the world. One aspect that is of particular concern to the scientific community is the role of health professionals, both in the obligations they have to treat individual suffering and in the instances where health professions have been complicit in the practice of torture.
Two reports published at the end of August, 2004 document numerous cases of the involvement of health professionals in the torture of prisoners held at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. The reports accuse medics of a range of crimes, from negligence to collusion in covering up torture-related deaths. While the reports claim that these violations were spurred by confusion over permitted interrogation practices and whether treatment of the prisoners should be governed by the Geneva Conventions, the complicity of health professionals should have been avoided by medical ethics training and better oversight.
- Investigation of Intelligence Activities At Abu Ghraib (Fay Report)
- Final Report of the Independent Panel to Review DOD Detention Operations (Schlessinger Report)
The World Medical Association's Declaration of Tokyo asserts, "The doctor shall not provide any...knowledge to facilitate the practice of torture or other forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, or to diminish the ability of the victim to resist such treatment." Many medical professional societies, such as the World Psychiatric Association and the International Council of Nurses, have similar statements forbidding medical involvement in torture and other acts that violate the dignity or physical integrity of the human beings in their members' care.
Medical professionals often find themselves in ethically dubious positions, being asked to supervise abuse, certify prisoners' fitness for execution or torture, or otherwise violate their singular loyalty to the patient. A 2002 report published by Physicians for Human Rights and the Health Sciences Faculty of the University of Cape Town, Dual Loyalty and Human Rights in Health Professional Practice, stresses that, while human rights violations flourish particularly in oppressive societies lacking basic freedoms of expression and association, they can also arise in more open societies when the health worker feels competing loyalties, such as in prisons and other detention facilities. In these situations the role of the medical professional is often ambiguous and they may not feel like they have adequate authority or security (financially or emotionally) to stand up to unethical practices.
Dual Loyalty points out that "in the absence of clear imperatives accompanied by training and support, [medical professionals] understandably tend to follow cultural practices, some of which are built into law" (Dual Loyalty, 32). Personal prejudices on the part of health workers can also manifest themselves in substandard or unethical clinical practices.
The report identified six major "dual loyalty practices" that violate human rights:
- Using medical skills or expertise on behalf of the state or other third party to inflict pain or physical or psychological harm on an individual that is not a legitimate part of medical treatment.
- Subordinating independent judgment, whether in evaluative or treatment settings, to support conclusions favoring the state or other third party.
- Limiting or denying medical treatment or information related to treatment of an individual in order to effectuate policy or practice of the state or other third party.
- Disclosing confidential patient information to state authorities or other third parties in circumstances that violate human rights.
- Performing evaluations for state or private purposes in a manner that facilitates violations of human rights.
- Remaining silent in the face of human rights abuses committed against individuals in the care of health professionals.
The key to resisting discriminatory practices, most concerned professionals agree, is accountability and transparency in decision making. "In all circumstances where departure from undivided loyalty takes place, what is critical to the moral acceptability of such departures is the fairness and transparency of the balancing of conflicting interests, and the way in which such a balancing is, or is not, consistent with human rights" (Dual Loyalty, 3). While resistance to violations of human rights must involve both individual and collective action founded on a universally-applicable human rights framework, knowledge of a generic set of human rights rules is not enough. Training of medical practitioners to question and apply "constructive doubt" in their daily procedures is vital to combating violations.
- A Project of the International Dual Loyalty Working Group A Collaborative Initiative of Physicians for Human Rights and the School of Public Health and Primary Health Care University of Cape Town, Health Sciences Faculty
Relevant International Treaties and Declarations
- The Universal Declaration
of Human Rights (UDHR)
The UDHR was adopted without dissent by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 10 December 1948
- The UN Convention
Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
Entered into force 26 June 1987- The Convention defines torture as: "any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions."
- The Standard Minimum
Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners
Adopted by the First United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, held at Geneva in 1955, and approved by the Economic and Social Council by its resolution 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977 - Principles of Medical
Ethics relevant to the Role of Health Personnel, particularly Physicians,
in the Protection of Prisoners and Detainees against Torture and Other Cruel,
Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
Adopted by General Assembly resolution 37/194 of 18 December 1982 - Geneva Convention relative
to the Treatment of Prisoners of War
Adopted on 12 August 1949 by the Diplomatic Conference for the Establishment of International Conventions for the Protection of Victims of War, held in Geneva from 21 April to 12 August, 1949 entry into force 21 October 1950 - World Medical Association Declaration
of Geneva International Code of Medical Ethics
Adopted by the 3rd General Assembly of the World Medical Association, London, England, October 1949 and amended by the 22nd World Medical Assembly Sydney, Australia, August 1968 and the 35th World Medical Assembly Venice, Italy, October 1983
- World Medical Association
Declaration of Tokyo
Adopted by the 29th World Medical Assembly Tokyo, Japan, October 1975
Guidelines for Medical Doctors Concerning Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment in Relation to Detention and Imprisonment
- World Psychiatric
Association Declaration of Hawaii
As approved by the General Assembly of the World Psychiatric Association in Vienna, Austria, on 10th July 1983
Quick Facts on Torture
- Human rights organizations have cited 125 countries where individuals and families have been detained and then tortured or ill-treated.
- Among the refugees from countries of state-sponsored torture, up to 35% have been tortured and 90% have seen the effects of torture.
- There are an estimated 500,000 torture survivors in the United States from foreign countries.
Links to Organizations Working on the Issue of Torture
- Amnesty International Stop Torture Campaign
- United Nations Voluntary Fund for Victims of Torture
- Torture Abolition and Survivors Support Coalition
- World Organization Against Torture
- The International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims
- Center for Victims of Torture
- European Committee for the Prevention of Torture
- Canadian Centre for the Victims of Torture
- Medical Foundation for the Care of Victims of Torture (UK)
- Advocates for Survivors of Torture and Trauma
- Association for the Prevention of Torture
- REDRESS
- Survivors International
- Torture Survivors Network
- Crimes of War Project
- Bellevue/NYU Program for Survivors of Torture
- Physicians for Human Rights
- Human Rights First
Manuals & Curricula
- The Istanbul Protocol: The Manual on Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
- Combating torture: a manual for action (Amnesty International)
- The Torture Reporting Handbook: how to document and respond to allegations of torture within the international system for the protection of human rights (Human Rights Centre, University of Essex)
- September 11 and International Humanitarian Law. This activity introduces students to international humanitarian law and engages them in an examination of the events of September 11, 2001 and their aftermath according to those standards. (Human Rights Resource Center)
- FAQ on Torture (Physicians for Human Rights)
- How Psychology Can Help Explain The Iraqi Prisoner Abuse (American Psychological Association)
Selected News Articles & Commentaries
- MSNBC - The Roots of Torture
- Crimes of War Project - The Iraq Prison Scandal: Who Should Be Held Responsible?
- Crimes of War Project - "Stress and Duress:" Drawing the line between Interrogation and Torture
- Crimes of War Project - Security Contractors in Iraq: Armed Guards or Private Soldiers?
- New York Review of Books - Torture and Truth
- CNN - Dershowitz: Torture could be justified
- Bush Administration Lawyers Greenlight Torture: Memo Suggests Intent to Commit War Crimes - Human Rights Watch News
- Summary of International and U.S. Law Prohibiting Torture and Other Ill-treatment of Persons in Custody - Human Rights Watch
- Science
- Laying Abominable Ghosts to Rest: Using new techniques and an abundance
of empathy, a pioneering center is setting standards for how to heal the wounds,
physical and emotional, of torture victims
Updated 9/9/2004. Please send any corrections or additions to:
AAAS is not responsible for the content of external websites.
