|

CHAPTER 8
Violations of Specific
Covenant Rights
This chapter lists examples of how articles of the Covenant are often
violated, according to reports of the UN Committee on Economic, Social
and Cultural Rights and other sources. The relevant articles are reproduced
here. The full text of the Covenant is included in Annex I.
Most employment activity, as well as most social, economic and cultural
activity, takes place in the private sector and in civil society. Thus,
as our examples of violations show, human rights abuses are not always
caused by a government’s activities or its failure to act. But governments
are obligated to do something to prevent, halt or correct violations.
The final responsibility for upholding human rights rests with governments.
Many human rights abuses occur because ordinary people or businesses
do not know or think about human rights. Government staff and members
of the public may not understand that a “normal” way of doing things might
lead to infringements of the economic, social or cultural rights of someone
else. Neglect of human rights, though not deliberate, can nonetheless
harm a neighbour, a workmate, a family member or an entire community.
The following chapter offer a few examples of the many types of possible
violations of individual human rights under Articles 6 to 15 of the Covenant,
as well as related group or collective rights under Articles 1, 15 and
25. Note that many violations of Covenant articles also violate articles
of CEDAW and the CRC.
The illustrations given in this chapter may help readers to discover,
recognise, foresee and combat similar human rights abuses. In strictly
technical terms, although certain incidents and practices described below
involve actions and omissions by commercial or other private interests,
and are not directly attributable to a government, the State is responsible
for the human rights violations. It is the State that violates the Covenant,
through its failure to meet its obligations to respect, protect and fulfil
Covenant rights.
Article 6 Right to Work*
- The States Parties to the present Covenant recognise the right to
work, which includes the right of everyone to the opportunity to gain
his [or her] living by work which he [or she] freely chooses or accepts,
and will take appropriate steps to safeguard this right.
- The steps to be taken by a State Party to the present Covenant to
achieve the full realisation of this right shall include technical and
vocational guidance and training programmes, policies and techniques
to achieve steady economic, social and cultural development and full
and productive employment under conditions safeguarding fundamental
political and economic freedoms to the individual.
Article 7 Right to Just
and Favourable Conditions of Work
1. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognise the right of
everyone to the enjoyment of just and favourable conditions of work
which ensure, in particular:
a. Remuneration which provides all workers, as a minimum, with
(i) Fair wages and equal remuneration for work of equal value without
distinction of any kind, in particular women being guaranteed conditions
of work not inferior to those enjoyed by men, with equal pay for
equal work;
(ii) A decent living for themselves and their families in accordance
with the provisions of the present Covenant;
b. Safe and healthy working conditions;
c. Equal opportunity for everyone to be promoted in his [or her]
employment to an appropriate higher level, subject to no considerations
other than those of seniority and competence;
d. Rest, leisure and reasonable limitation of working hours and
periodic holidays with pay, as well as remuneration for public holidays.
Examples of Violations of
Articles 6 and 7
- Government bodies that monitor conditions of work fail consistently
to condemn or to stop discrimination against women or minorities in
the workplace.
- Government bodies that monitor conditions of work fail to condemn
or to stop violence against workers (often women or children) in the
workplace.
- Governments fail to pass laws or take other actions to encourage
changes in workplaces that would help people with disabilities to find
and keep a job.
- National laws or practices restrict women’s ability to work outside
their homes.
- Government bodies fail to deal with dangerous conditions that threaten
people at the workplace (including exposure to hazardous chemicals in
factories and to agricultural pesticides on farms).
- The government does not provide enough staff and resources to inspect
workplaces and to enforce legislation on industrial safety and workers’
health.
- Wages are not paid over a long period, without adequate recourse
for workers.
- Legislation exempts workers in export processing zones (also called
“special economic zones” or “maquiladoras”) from protections covering
workers elsewhere. Workers in export processing zones often endure poor
health and safety conditions and standards at work, extremely low wages
and long hours, monotonous tasks, exposure to high levels of poisonous
chemicals and gases, lack of safety equipment, extreme heat and noise,
physical and sexual abuse, and bans on efforts to seek better conditions.
(Since most export processing zone workers are women, multiple violations
of several international human rights treaties—including gender discrimination—may
occur at the same time.)
States violate Articles 6 and 7 if they commit or permit workplace discrimination
or violence against government employees. States also violate these articles
if they do not pass or enforce statutes, regulations or laws to prohibit
discriminatory and harmful employment practices for employees who work
for any kind of employer, public or private.
|
8.1
Violations of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Often Occur at
the Same Time as Violations of Civil and Political Rights Example:
Forced and Bonded Labour
When
forced labour is permitted, as it is in many nations, this violates
civil and political rights as well as economic and social rights.
In situations of forced labour, bosses employ abuse, threats or
physical force to keep workers at a place of work. A related problem
is “bonded labour” of adults or children. This can involve a situation
in which a person’s labour is sold to an employer for a fixed number
of years, perhaps by the parents of the worker when she or he was
a child. A similar abuse is “debt bondage”, in which an individual
must continue to work to pay debts to the employer, but the debts
keep adding up and can never be fully paid off.
While
forced or bonded labour violates Articles 6 and 7 of the Covenant
(and other articles), it also violates several civil and political
rights proclaimed in the Universal Declaration and the ICCPR, including:
right to liberty and security of the person; prohibition of slavery
and involuntary servitude; prohibition of cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment; and freedom of movement. Two treaties of the International
Labour Organisation (Conventions No. 29 and 105) also prohibit the
use of forced labour. ILO Convention 182, Convention on the Worst
Forms of Child Labour, was adopted in June 1999 and is now open
for signature and ratification by States.
With
respect to child labourers, note also the concluding part of paragraph
3 of Covenant Article 10:
Children and
young persons should be protected from economic and social exploitation.
Their employment in work harmful to their morals or health or
dangerous to life or likely to hamper their normal development
should be punishable by law. States
should also set age limits below which the paid employment of
child labour should be prohibited and punishable by law.
Regrettably,
in some countries, caution is required when reporting child labour
abuses to police or to government officials. Corrupt police or officials
may support the interests of owners whose businesses or farms exploit
child workers. As in other situations where NGOs want to advance
or protect human rights, it is often prudent to work for change
through a network or coalition of national and international groups
that can assist and offer protection to each other.
|
Article 8 Trade Union Rights
1. The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to ensure:
a. The right of everyone to form trade unions and join the trade
union of his [or her] choice, subject only to the rules of the organisation
concerned, for the promotion and protection of his [or her] economic
and social interests. No restrictions may be placed on the exercise
of this right other than those prescribed by law and which are necessary
in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public
order or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others;
b. The right of trade unions to establish national federations or
confederations and the right of the latter to form or join international
trade union organisations;
c. The right of trade unions to function freely subject to no limitations
other than those prescribed by law and which are necessary in a democratic
society in the interests of national security or public order or for
the protection of the rights and freedoms of others;
d. The right to strike, provided that it is exercised in conformity
with the laws of the particular country.
2. This article shall not prevent the imposition of lawful restrictions
on the exercise of these rights by members of the armed forces or of
the police or of the administration of the State.
3. Nothing in this article shall authorise States Parties to the International
Labour Organisation Convention of 1948 concerning Freedom of Association
and Protection of the Right to Organise to take legislative measures
which would prejudice, or apply the law in such a manner as would prejudice,
the guarantees provided for in that Convention.
Summary of Important Elements
of Article 8
Everyone has the right to be part of a trade union that he or she freely
chooses to join, for the promotion and protection of his or her interests.
Trade unions have a right to band together with other trade unions. Workers
have the right to strike, that is, to refuse to work, in order to seek
better wages or conditions, as long as the strike does not violate national
laws. States are allowed to place reasonable restrictions on all of these
rights, but only if the restrictions are clearly needed in order to protect
other people’s rights. Some additional reasonable restrictions are allowed
on the employment rights of people working for the police, the military,
or other branches of government.
Examples of Violations of
Article 8
- In the absence of legislative protection or enforcement, employers
or supervisors discriminate against union members, by denying them promotion,
assigning them to dangerous or low paid positions, or by subjecting
union members to intimidation, racial harassment, sexual harassment,
non-payment of wages, or wrongful dismissal from employment.
- The government permits union offices or property to be attacked,
by its own or other agents, including damaging or seizing offices and
equipment, closing or denying access to union offices, cutting telephone
lines or blocking other communication links to union offices, and/or
seizing union funds.
- The State allows only company-sponsored or government-controlled
unions to operate.
- The government bans trade unions for all workers, or for certain
groups such as civil servants, workers in export processing zones, or
workers in foreign-owned, “multinational” or “transnational” corporations;
or prohibits the right to strike for one or more of these groups.
Article 9 Right to Social
Security
The States Parties to the present Covenant recognise the right of everyone
to social security, including social insurance.
Note on Article 9
A similar right in Article 25 of the Universal Declaration, on which
this Covenant right is based, gives more details of what is meant by social
security: “necessary social services, and the right to security in the
event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other
lack of livelihood”. The financing of certain forms of social security
may depend upon a mixture of State and private financial contributions.
Examples are publicly funded pensions for older people, unemployment insurance
and rehabilitation services or financial assistance for work-related injuries
(for example, through workers’ compensation). In addition to the social
security right in Article 9, social benefit programmes help to meet other
human rights obligations such as the right to an adequate standard of
living in Article 11 of the Covenant.
Examples of Violations of
Article 9
- Legislation excludes foreign and migrant workers, street vendors,
and other workers who do not have full-time jobs from social benefits
and protections, such as health care services, workers’ compensation,
unemployment insurance benefits, sickness benefits, special services
and benefits for new mothers and infants, old age security payments
or pensions, survivors’ benefits (for widows, widowers and orphaned
children), and financial support for other individuals and families
in need.
- Many of the social safety and security programmes listed above are
not established at all by employers, despite their having the financial
ability to provide them, and the government permits this.
Article 10 Right to Protection
and Assistance for Families
The States Parties to the present Covenant recognise that:
1. The widest possible protection and assistance should be accorded
to the family, which is the natural and fundamental group unit of society,
particularly for its establishment and while it is responsible for the
care and education of dependent children. Marriage must be entered into
with the free consent of the intending spouses.
2. Special protection should be accorded to mothers during a reasonable
period before and after childbirth. During such period working mothers
should be accorded paid leave or leave with adequate social security
benefits.
3. Special measures of protection and assistance should be taken on
behalf of all children and young persons without any discrimination
for reasons of parentage or other conditions. Children and young persons
should be protected from economic and social exploitation. Their employment
in work harmful to their morals or health or dangerous to life or likely
to hamper their normal development should be punishable by law. States
should also set age limits below which the paid employment of child
labour should be prohibited and punishable by law.
Examples of Violations of
Article 10
- Laws and traditional practices deny women equality with regard to
family rights, including the right to divorce; and marriages are arranged
for women or children without their full or free consent.
- Governments fail to monitor and register cases of family (“domestic”)
violence against women or children, or to ensure appropriate punishment
for those convicted of violence, or to provide shelters and other protections
for women and children who are victims of violence.
- Pregnant women are denied the opportunity to work or are restricted
from certain kinds of work. Or, on the other hand, because of their
pregnancy women suffer mistreatment and intimidation, including assignment
to more difficult or dangerous work (perhaps to try to force them to
quit their jobs).
- Children born to unmarried parents are discriminated against, and
the country’s laws permit this.
- The State does not provide adequate resources and procedures to monitor
and enforce laws that require protection of children who work; and there
is no law that says that all workers must be a minimum age before they
can work.
- In places where there are large numbers of abandoned children and
street children (some of whom may be child labourers), such children
may be harassed by police or by civilian vigilantes, or rounded up by
police and detained in adult jails.
Additional Note on Article
10
There are also family-connected rights in Articles 17 and 23 of the ICCPR
that involve marriage, protection of families by society and the State,
and protection against arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy,
family and the home. A judgment by the European Court of Human Rights,
noted above, shows that courts can make interesting links among economic,
social, civil, political and environmental rights.
|
8.2
The Interests of Industry v. a Family The Lopez-Ostra Case,
Spain
In
the anti-pollution case of Lopez-Ostra v. Spain, the European
Court of Human Rights ruled in favour of the petitioner, Ms. Lopez-Ostra.
The judges decided that there was a violation of respect for her
home and for her private and family life.
An
industrial plant that treated wastes from animal hide tanneries
began to operate a few steps from the home of Ms. Lopez-Ostra. Fumes
from the plant led to serious health problems for her. Despite her
complaints, the company continued operating. Municipal and other
authorities did not halt the harmful practices. Spanish courts did
not support efforts by Ms. Lopez-Ostra to gain compensation. Finally,
the European Court of Human Rights held that there was a breach
of Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human
Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, covering rights to enjoyment of
respect for the home and for private and family life. The Court
awarded compensation of four million pesetas to Ms. Lopez-Ostra.
The
judges on the European Court said there must be a fair balancing
of interests. In Ms. Lopez-Ostra’s case, they decided that there
was competition between the rights of an individual person and the
economic well-being of a municipality. The Court ruled that the
proper balance gave priority to individual human rights.
[Case 41/1993, Judgment of 9 Dec. 1994; Ser. A No.303C (1994)]
|
Article 11 Right to an Adequate
Standard of Living
1. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognise the right of
everyone to an adequate standard of living for himself [or herself]
and his [or her] family, including adequate food, clothing and housing,
and to the continuous improvement of living conditions. The States Parties
will take appropriate steps to ensure the realisation of this right,
recognising to this effect the essential importance of international
co-operation based on free consent.
2. The States Parties to the present Covenant, recognising the fundamental
right of everyone to be free from hunger, shall take, individually and
through international co-operation, the measures, including specific
programmes, which are needed:
a. To improve methods of production, conservation and distribution
of food by making full use of technical and scientific knowledge,
by disseminating knowledge of the principles of nutrition and by developing
or reforming agrarian systems in such a way as to achieve the most
efficient development and utilisation of natural resources;
b. Taking into account the problems of both food-importing and food-exporting
countries, to ensure an equitable distribution of world food supplies
in relation to need.
Summary of Important Elements
of Article 11
Every individual and family has the right to an adequate and steadily
improving standard of living, including adequate food, clothing and housing.
States should support improved production methods and fairer distribution
of food, to ensure that no one suffers from hunger.
Examples of Violations of
Article 11
- Governments allow people to be forcibly evicted from their homes to
make way for business development or for slum clearance and demolition.
- Governments fail to ensure that there is compensation for such people
when they are evicted or relocated.
- Governments fail to ensure that people who are involuntarily removed
from their homes receive replacement housing or land, and that they
receive access to essential services such as water, electricity, drainage,
garbage removal, and adequate educational opportunities for their children.
- A State allows people to continue to live with terrible housing,
sanitary or other conditions, or to suffer from starvation, when it
has resources it could use to improve these living conditions.
- Environmental legislation is not enforced when a government agency
or a corporation takes steps that damage the environment and human health.
- Equal rights are not ensured for women to own, use and inherit land
or other property. This can include inheritance laws that prevent widows
or other female family members from gaining access to land and property,
and other laws that give married women fewer rights than men in cases
of divorce or separation.
- Because of discrimination, access to markets is prevented for certain
groups who want to earn their living by selling items or services, and
the government does not take action to remove the discriminatory barriers.
- Subsidies for basic foods such as rice or flour are cancelled by
the government, without introducing a replacement programme to ensure
that the poorest people can afford to buy food or can obtain it through
other means.
- To make way for a mine, hydroelectric dam, shrimp farm, tourist resort
or other large project, the government allows peasants, fishers, indigenous
people or others to be forcibly evicted from ancestral lands, fishing
areas, forests, or other places that are traditional sources of food
and spiritual inspiration. (Such actions may also violate Covenant Articles
1, 15 and 25, as described below.)
|
8.3
Rights to Health and Food Compete with Gold Mining / Turkey
In
1997, one of Turkey’s top courts ordered a gold mining project to
stop, declaring it unconstitutional. The judges ruled that the operation
violated a part of Turkey’s constitution that protects everyone’s
right to a healthful, intact environment. Opposition to the mine
was led by local olive growers, because clearing land for the mine
required felling thousands of trees and preparatory drilling made
the farmers’ water undrinkable for four months. The mining technique
planned by the French firm, Eurogold, relied on the use of cyanide
leaching; and the tailings (mine waste) pond would sit on an active
earthquake fault line.
When
the olive farmers organised a referendum on the mine, 90 percent
of eligible voters in the area turned out; none voted for the project.
Army tanks were sent into the area just before the court decision,
but the growers responded with a peaceful demonstration of 10,000
people and 1,000 tractors. The growers thus successfully used several
civil and political rights to protect economic and social rights,
as well as protecting related environmental rights implied but not
openly stated in several articles of the Covenant.
(The
details of this case were found in 1998 on the former website of
the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund (http://www.sierraclub.org),
now called the Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund. That NGO’s Web address
is: http://www.earthjustice.org/.
|
Article 12 Right to Health
1. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognise the right of
everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical
and mental health.
2. The steps to be taken by the States Parties to the present Covenant
to achieve the full realisation of this right shall include those necessary
for:
a. The provision for the reduction of the stillbirth rate and of
infant mortality and for the healthy development of the child;
b. The improvement of all aspects of environmental and industrial
hygiene;
c. The prevention, treatment and control of epidemic, endemic, occupational
and other diseases;
d. The creation of conditions which would assure to all medical service
and medical attention in the event of sickness.
Note on Article 12
An adequate supply of clean water is required in order to implement the
right to health and the right to an adequate standard of living. Failure
to ensure adequate supplies of safe water for drinking and other purposes
violates the rights to food, health and an adequate standard of living.
Examples of Violations of
Article 12
- The State fails to provide or to ensure immunisation for every child
against common childhood diseases.
- The availability of health care providers such as nurses and doctors
is satisfactory or good in the cities but very poor for people in rural
areas, and governmental efforts to rectify the imbalance are weak or
non-existent.
- Corporations and the State permit the environment to be poisoned
or destroyed by harmful practices in mineral or oil production and exploration,
manufacturing, forestry, fishing or farming.
- Laws and policies obstruct women’s access to full reproductive health
services or attempt to control women’s sexual and reproductive behaviour
by restricting their access to contraception, or by forcing them to
have abortions or to be part of large sterilisation campaigns. Laws
and policies that attempt to control women’s sexual and reproductive
behaviour may include a requirement that a married woman receive authorisation
from her spouse before she may obtain reproductive services.
- Laws permit or support medical or cultural practices that endanger
health, or governments do not enforce laws prohibiting the practices.
- The government fails to take sufficient public health measures to
protect against and fight infectious diseases. (Some diseases like tuberculosis
and malaria are spreading again, partly because public health services
have been allowed to weaken.)
- Public authorities allow people living near factories or in farming
areas to be exposed to a steady stream of hazardous chemical emissions
or agricultural pesticides and herbicides.
|
8.4
Right to Health and Prevention of Disease / Argentina
Under
Argentina’s constitutional system, international human rights treaties
such as the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights are an enforceable part of national law. A decision by the
Argentine Court of Appeals in 1999 requires the State to ensure
that vaccine is manufactured to protect people threatened by a serious
disease in one region of the country. Argentine Haemorrhagic Fever
poses a danger to the 3.5 million inhabitants of the Pampas. People
living in the area do not always have easy access to medical services
and the disease causes death in many cases. The most effective way
to combat the disease is a proven vaccine that is effective 95 percent
of the time. But the vaccine is not profitable for drug companies,
so no company makes it.
After
reading about the predicament in newspaper articles, an Argentine
NGO, CELS, launched a court proceeding based on the right to health
care. A court rejected the initial case, but the Court of Appeals
ruled that the State must manufacture the vaccine and gave the State
a span of time in which to fulfil the obligation. The Appeals Court
judges based their ruling on Article 12 of the Covenant, as well
as on provisions in the American Convention on Human Rights and
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Article 12 of the Covenant
specifically covers States’ obligations to prevent and treat epidemic
and endemic diseases.
The
Argentine judges imposed personal responsibility on two ministers
to ensure that the vaccine would be produced within the specified
period. This approach reinforces the view that social rights involve
legal responsibilities, and are not just political goals. The decision
reaffirmed the role of the State as the guarantor of the right to
health care when private interests cannot or will not provide the
necessary means to prevent or cure disease. In the months following
the Court of Appeals’ order, the government did provide funds and
resources for a laboratory to make the vaccine, and construction
was started.
|
Articles 13 and 14: Right
to Education
Article 13
1. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognise the right of
everyone to education. They agree that education shall be directed to
the full development of the human personality and the sense of its dignity,
and shall strengthen the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.
They further agree that education shall enable all persons to participate
effectively in a free society, promote understanding, tolerance and
friendship amongst all nations and all racial, ethnic or religious groups,
and further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance
of peace.
2. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognise that, with
a view to achieving the full realisation of this right:
a. Primary education shall be compulsory and available free to all;
b. Secondary education in its different forms, including technical
and vocational secondary education, shall be made generally available
and accessible to all by every appropriate means, and in particular
by the progressive introduction of free education;
c. Higher education shall be made equally accessible to all, on the
basis of capacity, by every appropriate means, and in particular by
the progressive introduction of free education;
d. Fundamental education shall be encouraged or intensified as far
as possible for those persons who have not received or completed the
whole period of their primary education;
e. The development of a system of schools at all levels shall be
actively pursued, an adequate fellowship system shall be established,
and the material conditions of teaching staff shall be continuously
improved.
3. The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to have respect
for the liberty of parents and, when applicable, legal guardians to
choose for their children schools, other than those established by the
public authorities, which conform to such minimum educational standards
as may be laid down or approved by the State and to ensure the religious
and moral education of their children in conformity with their own convictions.
4. No part of this article shall be construed so as to interfere with
the liberty of individuals and bodies to establish and direct educational
institutions, subject always to the observance of the principles set
forth in paragraph 1 of this article and to the requirement that the
education given in such institutions shall conform to such minimum standards
as may be laid down by the State.
Article 14
Each State Party to the present Covenant . . . undertakes, within two
years, to work out and adopt a detailed plan of action for the progressive
implementation, within a reasonable number of years, to be fixed in
the plan, of the principle of compulsory education free of charge for
all.
Summary of Important Elements
of Articles 13 and 14
Everyone has the right to primary education that is free of charge. As
far as possible, States will also ensure that there is equal access to
free high school education or to other forms of secondary education or
training, and to education beyond the secondary level. Education must
strengthen respect for human rights and enable everyone to participate
effectively in a free society.
Examples of Violations of
Articles 13 and 14
- The State fails to make primary education compulsory and available
to all children, on a free basis. Note that in some countries, commitment
to universal education has recently been reduced, which seems to be
a clear violation of the Covenant.
- There is a failure to give equal priority to the education of girls
and women, as compared with boys and men. In countries where there are
separate schools for boys and girls, there is often greater investment
in classrooms and other facilities for boys’ education, giving them
more schools, better facilities, and a greater range of subjects to
study than are available to girls. In all countries, the government
should ensure that the educational system is fair to both boys and girls.
- The educational system discriminates against members of minority
groups in schools and in university education.
- Education is used mainly to impose the religious or political views
of the State’s dominant groups as the only “truth”, removing any teachers
or instruction that allow students to hear about alternative views.
(This restrictive approach also fails to respect the civil and political
rights of freedom of religion and freedom of opinion.)
- There are large differences between the quality and/or availability
of education offered within the regions of a country, because of discrimination
based on ethnic or racial distinctions, or based on the income levels
of local people, and the government does not undertake measures to rectify
the situation.
- There is a failure to formulate or implement effective policies to
encourage disadvantaged groups to attend school, including failure to
ensure that public and private institutions provide appropriate educational
programmes and opportunities for individuals who have a physical, mental,
learning or medical disability.
Article 15 Right to Enjoy
Cultural Life and the Benefits of Scientific Progress
1. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognise the right
of everyone:
a. To take part in cultural life;
b. To enjoy the benefits of scientific progress and its applications;
c. To benefit from the protection of the moral and material interests
resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of
which he [or she] is the author.
2. The steps to be taken by the States Parties to the present Covenant
to achieve the full realisation of this right shall include those necessary
for the conservation, the development and the diffusion of science and
culture.
3. The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to respect
the freedom indispensable for scientific research and creative activity.
4. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognise the benefits
to be derived from the encouragement and development of international
contacts and co-operation in the scientific and cultural fields.
Examples of Violations of
Article 15
- In a country or in one region of a country, there is discouragement
of, or bans on, the use of languages spoken by a large part of the population,
whether a minority or a majority.
- The rights of scientists and artists to travel and communicate, and
to exchange information and ideas across borders are unfairly restricted.
- The State bans the production, performance or importation of certain
publications, plays or films that express ideas contrary to those expressed
by the government or by the State-run or “official” media.
Covenant Articles that Guarantee
Group or Collective Rights
Article 15 guarantees the individual property rights of inventors, artists
and writers, so that they can benefit from the economic and cultural value
of their creations and innovations. Article 15 can also be interpreted
to protect the shared “intellectual property” rights or “traditional knowledge”
of agricultural or other rural communities. That purpose of Article 15
can be seen when we connect it to Articles 1 and 25 of the Covenant.
Article 1 Right of Peoples
to Self-Determination
1. All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that
right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue
their economic, social and cultural development.
2. All peoples may, for their own ends, freely dispose of their natural
wealth and resources without prejudice to any obligations arising out
of international economic co-operation, based upon the principle of
mutual benefit, and international law. In no case may a people be deprived
of its own means of subsistence.
3. The States Parties to the present Covenant . . . shall promote the
realisation of the right of self-determination, and shall respect that
right, in conformity with the provisions of the Charter of the United
Nations.
Article 25 Right of All
Peoples to Control the Use of Their Natural Resources
Nothing in the present Covenant shall be interpreted as impairing the
inherent right of all peoples to enjoy and utilise fully and freely
their natural wealth and resources.
Note on Articles 1 and 25
A violation of Article 15 rights of members of a minority community or
of an indigenous group might also violate Articles 1 and 25 of the Covenant.
When read together, these three articles support the recognition and preservation
of traditional knowledge that has been built up over generations by minority
and indigenous peoples. In a sense, this is the right of a group to benefit
from its collected wisdom. This right is often not respected, as the two
illustrations at the end of this chapter demonstrate. The last sentence
of Article 1(2) also guarantees a group or “collective” right: “In no
case may a people be deprived of its own means of subsistence”. This sentence
connects the group right of self-determination with the right of everyone
to an adequate standard of living. This sentence can also be linked to
Article 17 of the Universal Declaration, which proclaims property rights:
17(1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association
with others.
17(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his [or her] property.
|
8.5
Denial of Natural Resource Rights and Cultural Rights for Indigenous
Peoples / Lubicon Cree, Canada
In
1990, the UN Human Rights Committee, which monitors implementation
of the ICCPR, dealt with a complaint against Canada by an indigenous
group, centering on the environment and on the use and control of
natural resources.
For
many years, the Lubicon Lake Indian Band, located in Alberta, Canada,
have complained that unwanted development activity by outside companies
deprived them of their right to live a traditional way of life and
to control their own resources. The Lubicon complaint to the UN
in the 1980s was primarily in response to oil and gas exploration.
The complaint focused on to the right of self-determination, control
of natural resources and the rights of a minority culture.
The
Human Rights Committee said that governmental and corporate actions
in Lubicon territory had not respected the Band’s rights as indigenous
people. That Committee also stated that unfair historical treatment
of the group, as well as recent economic development activities,
threatened the life and culture of the Lubicon Band, in violation
of Article 27 of the ICCPR. Article 27 guarantees the rights of
minorities to their own culture, religion and language.
More
details may be found through the website of the Friends of the Lubicon:
http://www.tao.ca/~fol/f1Pages/daifol.htm/.
|
The group rights to self-determination and to control over natural resources
in Article 1 include the right of “all peoples” to pursue their own economic,
social and cultural development. The concept of self-determination involves
being able to choose your own future as a people. This principle was important
for those seeking liberation from political and economic colonialism,
especially after World War II. Exercising the right to self-determination
enabled peoples (usually those living in a colony) to gain or regain control
over their own government, law, land and resources.
Today, the main focus of thinking on self-determination is on the right
of a people to pursue significant economic, social, cultural and political
activities that involve varying degrees of independence from government
policies or control. States rarely support the idea of a people within
their borders (usually a distinct minority or indigenous group) having
a right to seek total independence.
Examples of Violations of
Articles 1 and 25 AND of Article 15
- Governments fail to take adequate steps to safeguard the cultural
identity of various ethnic or religious groups, including failure to
prosecute or impose appropriate penalties on those who destroy significant
objects, structures or sites, including burial grounds, artifacts, and
relics.
- There is inadequate State or industry recognition of the value of
traditional knowledge in agriculture or medicine. Corporations are allowed
to take and profit from the customary knowledge of indigenous or other
groups without respecting their rights or giving them compensation.
- Land or other resources that are needed to maintain traditional forms
of culture and livelihood (for instance hunting, fishing, trapping,
herding, and gathering plants) are destroyed, taken or polluted by State
and/or business interests. (This may also violate Article 11.)
- Governmental bodies permit development of tourism projects in indigenous
territories without adequate coordination and without the consent of
the indigenous populations, seriously damaging indigenous peoples’ culture.
- Governmental bodies offer land titles to individual members of indigenous
groups when those groups traditionally take a collective approach to
owning and using property and resources. For such a community, individual
ownership can undermine the solidarity, rights and long-term sustainability
of the group.
|
8.6
Protecting the Right of a Group to Benefit from Its Traditional
Knowledge The Seed Keepers, India
Many
international companies use “intellectual property” clauses of the
World Trade Organisation to secure monopoly rights over plants and
other living things. Yet countless agricultural and medicinal plants
marketed today originated with farmers in the South who preserved
and developed them over generations.
Those
corporations that obtain patents pertaining to plants traditionally
used for food and medicine can demand a fee from others who use
the “new” products that the firms have “invented”. Many such patents
have been obtained for plants from India, including ones related
to the neem tree (a sacred tree with healing qualities, called in
India “the tree of life”). Indian activists were unable to obtain
prohibition of the practice of patenting traditional knowledge,
so Vandana Shiva and other advocates helped to organise a citizens’
campaign to protect national heritage.*
As part of the campaign, young lawyers were trained to go into the
countryside and persuade farmers to gather every kind of plant species
they could find in fields, woodlands and wild spaces. The seeds
have been catalogued in a “community seed register”, where they
are held for the benefit of the community. Such seeds are off limits
to patenting by private corporations. The registers establish prior
use, so that patents cannot be obtained.
Grassroots
seed-protection movements have been germinated not only in India,
but in Bangladesh and in parts of Africa and Latin America as well.
*Note
that in some instances, the Indian government has itself taken steps
to oppose foreign patenting of traditional knowledge.
A
source for futher information on protection of traditional knowledge
is the website of Rural Advancement Foundation International (RAFI),
at http://www.rafi.ca.
|
* These titles, “Right to Work”, “Trade
Union Rights”, “Right to Social Security”, etc., do not appear in the
Covenant, although the articles in the Covenant are often referred to
by these names. They are included here for clarity and ease of reference.
|