|
7. 1973-77:
The social struggle
After years of armed conflict
in Guatemala, 1973 opened a period of mass organizing around social and
economic issues. That year a sharp increase in petroleum prices provoked
a global economic crisis, especially in oil-importing countries like Guatemala.
In the countryside, agricultural inputs, such as petroleum-based fertilizers,
moved beyond the reach of peasants who had grown used to improved yields.
In Guatemala City the cost of basic goods increased sharply and salaries
lost much of their purchasing power.
After years of silence, urban workers, beginning with public primary
school teachers, began to agitate for wage increases to counteract the
effects of the crisis. Striking teachers included many university students
and the San Carlos campus provided them a space for organizing. After
a three-month strike, the teachers won a hefty wage increase from the
government. Inspired by the victory and aided by the consolidation of
organized labor, other public sector workers took to the picket lines.
With the decline in state violence (and guerrilla activity) the confidence
of popular organizations increased.
During the 1974 presidential elections, a blatant electoral fraud favored
the government's preferred candidate, General Kjell Eugenio Laugerud García,
representing the right-wing alliance between the Movement for National
Liberation and the Institutional Democratic Party (MLN-PID), against a
center-left alliance promoting the ticket of Christian Democrat General
José Efraín Ríos Montt and leftist economist Alberto
Fuentes Mohr.
In the early 1970s politics at the San Carlos was still not wholly dominated
by leftist parties. The strong organization of the Social Christian Student
Front (FESC) had led many students to support the Ríos Montt candidacy;
the same was true in the union movement, where Christian Democrats also
had a great degree of influence over the National Workers' Central (CNT).
In 1974, as in 1962, students and workers led the protest against the
fraud.
This forced the new government to seek legitimacy by coopting some of
the opposition's proposed reforms and allowing opponents greater political
space. Unlike previous presidents, Kjell Laugerud did not begin his term
in office with a wave of political violence to consolidate his control.
His government even sought negotiated solutions to certain labor conflicts
rather than the usual recourse to state repression to silence workers
(Levenson-Estrada 1994: 105).
During this political opening, on February 4, 1976, a devastating earthquake
shook Guatemala. Nearly 30,000 Guatemalans perished in the disaster and
close to a million were left without adequate housing. The earthquake
had a political impact as well: the visible incapacity and corruption
of the government to deal with the effects of the catastrophe led to a
rise in independent organizing and made many survivors deeply critical
of the government. In poor barrios disproportionately affected by the
quake, neighborhood groups helped to rescue victims or dig out the dead,
distribute water, food and reconstruction materials, and prevent looting
(Levenson-Estrada 1994: 52, 67, 124).
High school and university students participated in the reconstruction
effort, many with a distinctly political interest in strengthening connections
with the city's popular classes and building a mass movement. The organized
opposition to the government was gaining strength. University students
worked with the National Slum-Dwellers' Movement (MONAP) to demand greater
investment in local infrastructure and price controls on basic foodstuffs,
while increasing their coordination with public high school students through
the Secondary Students Coordinating Committee (CEEM). Within the University,
the AEU ceased to exist as just a small group of politically-minded leaders
and increased its ability to mobilize large numbers of students. On June
25, 1976 in the city center, the AEU held the decade's first mass protest
outside the University, commemorating the 20th anniversary of the 1956
student massacre (El movimiento estudiantil en Guatemala, no date;
interviews).
Meanwhile organized labor began to reassert the strength that it had
lost since the Counterrevolution. A few weeks after the earthquake, workers
at the Coca-Cola bottling company occupied the plant after management
tried to shut down the enterprise to destroy a growing union movement.
To aid the workers, unionists founded the National Committee of Trade
Union Solidarity (CNUS), a group which soon became the coordinating body
for much of the urban popular movement (Albizures 1985: 29).
Law students and labor lawyers, many from the San Carlos Law School,
advised workers and defended in the courts their right to form unions.
As a result, in 1977 more workers went on strike than in any other year
in the country's history. Press reports of these actions were numerous
and often favorable, and mass protests became a common occurrence in the
city. The year ended with the "Glorious March of the Miners of Ixtahuacán,"
involving
Figure
2. Number of killings and disappearances at the
University of San Carlos, by field of study, 1954 to 1996
Note:
Though Law and Economics are the faculties with the most victims, they
also have the most students. To give an idea of the relative sizes of
the USAC academic units, below are the student enrollments at the Guatemala
City campus for the year 1980, when urban violence reached its peak. Economics:
9132; Law: 5032; Engineering: 4393; Medicine: 4290; Architecture: 1982;
Agronomy: 1943; Chemical Sciences: 1241; Psychology: 1159; Humanities:
1062; Social Work: 826; Veterinary Medicine: 793; Dentistry: 762; History:
300; Political Science: 248; Communications: 149 (data from the USAC Department
of Registry and Statistics).
Mam and Ladino workers from Huehuetenango who, after days
of walking the Pan-American Highway, arrived in the capital accompanied
by thousands of supporters. For many observers, this protest represented
an early union of country and city, Mayas together with Ladinos, in common
cause against the power of the State (Levenson-Estrada 1994: 127-29).
But the political opening had its limits. The business community and
the government felt increasingly threatened by the mass opposition. Not
unexpectedly, violence against the popular movement and its University
allies began anew. In June 1977, armed men ambushed and killed Mario López
Larrave, the director of the University's Labor Orientation School and
the most important link between the University and the workers' movement.
His death foretold a wider repression: Amnesty International reported
61 murders in Guatemala in August of 1977 that appeared to be the work
of paramilitary death squads. Though security forces had stepped up their
repression of intellectuals and students, most of the victims were peasants,
workers and residents of poor urban neighborhoods (1978: 123).
The death of López Larrave marked the beginning of a sustained
attack on the activist Law School. The appendix of this report presents
the cases of students and professors killed or disappeared between 1974
and 1981, including many who worked in the Bufete Popular, such
as Edmundo Guerra Theilheimer, Johnny Dahinten Castillo, Carlos Recinos
Sandoval, Jorge Jiménez Cajas, Carlos Figueroa Aguja, Ranferí
Neftalí Paredes, Rodolfo Montoya, Jorge Mancio Ortiz, Carlos Tuch
Orellana, Oscar Bonilla de León and Eli Hidalgo Ponce. In the Labor
Orientation School, one source claimed that 70 percent of the teaching
staff was killed or forced into exile (CITGUA 1989: 62).
In the late 1970s the popular movement still had the organizational capacity
to respond to the repression with mass protest, often during the burial
of one or another victim of state violence (see Box #3).
Some participants from the period insist that this social movement emerged
spontaneously from different social sectors in the capital, and that these
sectors achieved a partial coordination through the mass mobilizations
of 1973 to 1978. Others acknowledge the role of the insurgent groups in
encouraging the development of a mass movement. The clandestine organizations,
according to these sources, helped build the connections between different
sectors: for example, between university and high school students, and
between squatters and allies in the University (interviews).
Either way, by 1978 social polarization was on the rise, together with
state repression. As a consequence, Guatemala was about to suffer a period
of terror on a scale unlike anything in the history of Central America.
|
Box III:
The martyrs of 1977
In 1977 two
members of the University community were brutally assassinated:
one a distinguished professor, the other a first-year student. Together
they represented the connections between the University of San Carlos
with the working class and with organized public school students,
and became the urban movement's first martyrs during its mobilization
between 1977 and 1981.
Mario López
Larrave
As was his custom,
on the afternoon of June 8, 1977 Law professor Mario López
Larrave left his clinic in Zone 4 of the capital, en route
to the University to give his evening classes. He never made it.
A group of armed men in a red Datsun ambushed López Larrave
in the parking lot, attacking him with machine gun fire before fleeing.
He died shortly after in a hospital emergency room.
The news hit
the Law School hard. One student remembers how, just a few hours
after the murder, professor Guillermo Alfonso Monzón Paz
entered his Criminal Law class and said: "Comrades: they've
just shot Mario López Larrave. Class is suspended."
(Monzón Paz himself was assassinated four years later, one
of thirty San Carlos Law professors killed by state forces.)
The crime appeared
directed against the University as a whole. Those who ordered the
assassination chose as their victim one of the most important and
beloved members of the university community. López Larrave
was, at the time of his death, a member of the University Governing
Board, professor and former dean of the Law School and the favored
leftist candidate for rector. In addition he was director of the
Labor Orientation School and adviser to over 100 labor unions. He
was "the great teacher of the workers' cause," according
to a eulogy the labor federation CNUS published in the newspapers.
López
Larrave was perhaps the most important figure in the effort to unite
the country's workers with middle class intellectuals. His work
had already made him the object of threats: in 1976, while advising
the union at the Coca-Cola bottling plant, he was warned to stop
helping the workers or he would suffer the consequences.
The day after
his death, more than 15,000 mourners accompanied his funeral procession,
their fists in the air in a sign of repudiation and their faces
unmasked, unlike in years to come. Violence against the popular
organizations was not yet a daily occurrence, and the movement responded
to the terror with a show of organizational force, confident in
the power of their numbers. As the violence increased over the following
months, the funeral processions only got longer and more militant.
In Guatemala, another phase of repression and organizing had begun
(Prensa Libre: June 9 1977; El Gráfico: June
9 1977; Boletín de la Junta Directiva de la Facultad de
Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales de la University de San Carlos
de Guatemala: no. 12, June 1977; Dunkerley 1988: 471; ASIES
1991: 487; interviews).
Robin García
In 1976, police
authorities warned 18 high school student leaders that their newspaper,
Pueblo y Estudiante, was a communist publication and would
not be tolerated in the public school system. Among those warned
were two friends and fellow students, Robin García Dávila
and Aníbal Leonel Caballeros Ramírez.
The next year
Robin García continued his studies in the Agronomy Faculty
of the University of San Carlos. Since middle school, Robin had
participated in an underground youth group. By 1976 he had joined
the Guerrilla Army of the Poor (EGP), a rebel group then establishing
its presence in the city, working with its Sub-commission for the
Organization of High School Students. Even after he graduated, García
continued to work with secondary students, responsible within the
EGP's clandestine structure for the work of Caballeros and other
student leaders organized with the insurgents.
On June 28,
1977, García and Caballeros attended a commemoration of the
first anniversary of the deaths of three student EGP militants in
Ciudad Satélite, in the municipality of Mixco near Guatemala
City. They left the celebration together, but never made it home.
Two days later, Caballeros' body turned up in Guatemala City. Robin
García, meanwhile, remained missing.
After years
of relative calm, the disappearance of García compelled students
to make a forceful, organized response to the reappearance of terror.
Over the next few days, the city (and many departmental capitals)
was rocked by student protests, from paid denunciations in the press,
to strikes in the public schools and daily marches through downtown
streets that ended in front of the national palace, all exhibiting
the slogan, "We want Robin back alive."
On August 4,
a week after he disappeared, the mutilated body of Robin García
was found by peasant farmers alongside the highway in Palín,
Escuintla. His body had been brutally beaten, his clothes had been
changed and his shoes were missing. His murderers left his identification
in his pocket, together with a note attributing the crime to Secret
Anticommunist Army (ESA), one of the leading paramilitary groups
connected to the security forces.
Robin García
became more celebrated in death than he was in life. On August 5,
1977, some 50,000 mourners accompanied his casket through the city's
streets, in what may have been the largest funeral in the history
of the University of San Carlos. Participants carried red carnations,
a sign of friendship that students turned into a symbol of protest.
The silent procession paralyzed the city's streets. For days denunciations
of the crime dominated the news.
The AEU and
the University Governing Board openly blamed the government for
García's murder and for the appearance of new death squads
like the ESA that attacked "the popular and democratic sectors."
In their communiqués, they also took the opportunity to denounce
the capitalist elite, the "fascistization" of Guatemala
and the "imperialist exploitation" of its natural resources.
President Laugerud García presented a defensive and conciliatory
posture, allowing students to hold their protests in different parts
of the country. Still, the deaths of Mario López Larrave
and Robin García signaled the end of the political opening
and the return of systematic state terror.
García,
just 19 years old when he died, became one of the principal martyrs
of the student movement. In 1978, he also became a symbol of the
revolutionary movement, his name adopted by the Robin García
Revolutionary Student Front (FERG), an above-ground group tied to
the EGP which within a few years would itself publicly advocate
armed struggle (El Gráfico: August 4 to 10 1977; interviews).
|
|