 |
Current Issue | Past Issues | About
the Report
AAAS Celebrates 25 Years of Science and Human Rights
On December 10, 2002, International Human Rights Day, the AAAS Science and
Human Rights Program (SHR) organized a program to celebrate its 25th anniversary.
The Science and Human Rights Program grew out of the Clearinghouse on Science
and Human Rights, which was established in 1977 by the AAAS Committee on Scientific
Freedom and Responsibility. Dr. John Edsall, the eminent Harvard scientist and
founder of the Committee, believed that scientific associations have not
only a right but a responsibility to concern themselves with the defense of
human rights of scientists. Documenting and publicizing cases of abuses
of scientists in other countries continued to be priorities when the Clearinghouse
was transformed into the Science and Human Rights Program in 1989.

At its 25th anniversary celebration, the Science and Human Rights Program
honored Dr. Richard Claude, pioneering human rights educator and author
of the recently published book Science in the Service of Human Rights.
|
Through the years the Program has continued to carry out human rights documentation
and advocacy in three areas: (1) violations of scientific freedom and the professional
rights of scientists; (2) violations of the human rights of scientists in their
capacity as citizens; and (3) participation by scientists in practices that
infringe upon the human rights of others. Begun in 1993, the AAAS Human Rights
Action Network (AAASHRAN) uses email and the World Wide Web to inform subscribers
of cases and developments deserving special attention and to coordinate scientists
efforts to appeal to governments on behalf of their colleagues. SHR also organizes
humanitarian and fact-finding missions to investigate human rights issues; prepares
documentation for Congress and other U.S. government officials and international
human rights groups; and organizes programs on human rights issues related to
science.
Although it is difficult to quantify the contributions of the Program to the
protection of the human rights of individual scientists and scientific groups,
SHRs efforts have played an important role in energizing the involvement
of scientists and other scientific associations in human rights-related activities.
Many of the scientists, engineers, and medical professionals for whom we have
advocated have credited our efforts as contributing to their improved treatment
or their release from prison.
In a recent communication, Dr. Moncef Marzouki, a former professor of public
health and human rights detainee in Tunisia, explained that solidarity from
outside ones group is especially welcome because it is direct proof that
ones struggle is understood and appreciated. He remembered the day
I got the first message from Victoria Baxter on behalf of the American Association
for the Advancement of Science. It was a happy one. He therefore asks
that we keep writing letters, showing interest, and lobbying on behalf of human
rights. It has much more effect than one can imagine. It keeps alive the
light of a fire refusing to die, called human brotherhood.
In addition to these efforts to bring human rights to the science community,
the Science and Human Rights Program has pioneered the application of a variety
of scientific methodologies to protect and promote human rights. In 1984 when
Argentina had recently returned to civilian rule, President Raul Alfonsín
and the Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo, a nongovernmental human rights organization,
requested the help of the Program in exhuming the mass graves of victims of
Argentinas dirty war and conducting genetic tests to try to
identify the children stolen from former dissidents and adopted by supporters
of the previous regime. SHR responded by sending a delegation of American forensic
and genetic scientists to Argentina. This first mission led to a major AAAS
initiative to apply forensic sciences to the investigation and documentation
of human rights violations and to provide this evidence to courts and special
commissions of inquiry. In the course of these efforts, the Program established,
trained, and supported the work of teams of forensic anthropologists in Argentina
and Guatemala.

In the 1980s, AAAS sent forensic scientists to Argentina to conduct training
on identifying skeletal remains. |
Since the mid-1990s, SHR has actively developed and applied new statistical
and information management techniques appropriate to dealing with large-scale
human rights violations. Human rights organizations and commissions increasingly
undertake projects that require an understanding of large-scale violations,
such as mass killings and genocide, deportations and ethnic cleansing, and systematic
detention and torture. However, the usual tools of human rights documentation
are inadequate for dealing with such phenomena. In order to understand large-scale
violations, human rights groups need to be able to collect, organize, and analyze
massive amounts of information. SHR has developed technical and scientific methodologies
for dealing with large-scale violations and has provided technical assistance
and training to truth commissions, tribunals, ombudsmen, and non-governmental
organizations in Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, South Africa, Cambodia, East Timor,
Kosovo, Sierra Leone and Sri Lanka.
The Program has also developed methodologies for monitoring human rights and
identifying violations, along with resource materials on how to use them. There
has been increasing awareness in recent years that the ability to undertake
systematic monitoring of the major international human rights instruments is
central to evaluating the performance of states and holding them accountable
for violations of these rights. SHR has focused its efforts on developing new
methodologies and resources for monitoring economic, social and cultural rights;
in the process it has played a major role in shaping the approaches and monitoring
strategies of other human rights organizations and of the UN Committee on Economic,
Social and Cultural Rights.
In the past 25 years, SHR has amply demonstrated that just as human rights are
indispensable to the conduct of science, science is equally necessary to the
promotion and protection of human rights. We are committed to promoting this
critical two-way linkage between science and human rights in the years ahead.
|  |